requiem for a meme


If you were to tune your television to NBC tonight around 9pm, you would find something very sad: the last episode of a fantastic series you never got to see. Hyped up throughout the Olympics (which, I guess, nobody saw either), “Heist” is one of those rare shows you could get pretty excited about. Featuring Dougray Scott leading a crew about to rob every jewelry story on Rodeo Drive – on Oscar Night, no less – it’s a seminar in great television writing.

Crisp, non-sequitur, surprising, tense, and thoroughly joyful, as brought to you by Doug Liman, the talent behind “Swingers,” “The Bourne Identity” and the inspired dialogue of “Go.” This show had a killer pilot, and the episodes got even better as it went on… the flawed, beautiful cop klepto, the burglar who looks like Jim Carrey and behaves like Bill Pullman in “Ruthless People,” the black-and-white cop team that kicks cliché’s ass… there are so many delicious low-hanging fruit in this series it’s ridiculous.

There’s a kind of writing out there right now that can best be defined as SNARK. In its purest form, it can be found from the fine folks at Gawker and Defamer, even well-respected online zines like Salon and Slate. It’s the attitude of “Best Week Ever” and “I Love the ’80s” on VH1, and its dumber cousins can be found on too-clever-by-half television shows that trade easy sarcasm for street cred. I’m not saying you do this, but Snark is the usual patois of internet comment sections.

Even though it’s Generation X’s vernacular (at least what we use when we’re not trying very hard), I like to think I’m not really in the snark business. If I dislike something, I tend to rant, and if I don’t, I usually think it’s goddamn beautiful. But many editors – and perhaps TV execs – are being fooled by the dull fool’s gold of snark’s potential.

This is what makes “Heist” so brilliant – it actually rode Snark and Clever over into Soulful. This is the hat trick of our generation’s art, and it makes the show’s rumored cancellation all the more sad. That’s the third show that has broken my heart over the last six months, along with “Eyes” and “In Justice.”

Why didn’t people tune in to “Heist”? Well, it probably didn’t help that shows named “Hustle” and “Thief” premiered at exactly the same time. Or perhaps this show needed a full season to germinate an audience, something struggling NBC had no interest in trying. As for me, I’ll say it right now: it hit my personal demographic in the sternum, and I’ll be tuning in tonight to relish a story that will never have an ending.


Speaking of good television, THIS IS GOOD TELEVISION:

thanks, Matt!

0 thoughts on “requiem for a meme

  1. killian

    Wow–Lucy brings “furniture cruising” to a whole ‘nuther level.
    Sorry about the demise of one of your faves. I never saw “Heist,” but, as with MANY things, because you like it, I pay attention.
    So, sneaky question, does your pilot have Snark riding over into Clever? AND WHEN WILL WE SEE IT!!!!?????
    ok. patience is a virtue. i remember. sigh.

  2. eric g.

    Are you kidding me? I actually look forward to watching “Heist” every Wednesday.
    Now I’ll be in a sour mood all day.
    When are we ever going to see Seymour Cassel in a series again?
    The American public continues to find new ways to piss me off.

  3. Alyson Peery

    It’s so funny how you come from the midwest and Tessa is from Texas, and both of your voices and attitudes are PURE Chapel Hill.
    What a sweet post.

  4. Father Tim

    Even when Lucy plays, she don’t play. As mentioned by her dad a while back, she has shit to do. Please get out of her way. Excellent clip.
    I wish I would’ve know about the Doug Liman show earlier because I would’ve made a point of watching. I’ve enjoyed each and every one of his movies. Plus, his dad, Arthur, was a badass trial lawyer who carried flew the good guys’ flag in trying to hold the Gipper and Co. accountable for all of the felonies committed during Iran-Contra. Speaking of lawyers, do any of you Tar Heelers know fellow alum, Tommy Goldstein, who was featured recently in the New Republic as the go-to Supreme Court litigator these days? He comes across in the article as a really good guy who has cracked the SC upper-crust circuit with a lot of hustle and lack of pretense. The white-shoe Ivy Leaguers don’t seem to have come to terms Goldstein’s success. I’d link the article, but I can’t get it to work.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.