treason’s harbour

4/25/07

There we were, in the existential, horrorshow aftermath of September 11, having spent all day helping ash-covered parents find their kids, making phone calls for 10-year-olds whose mothers were still in the Bronx, and wondering what the fuck had just happened to our city. Our so-called “President” G.W. Bush was on some airplane in an undisclosed location, and by late afternoon, the word started circulating that Islamist terrorists were to blame.

We were desperate for somebody to Be In Charge, and that evening, somebody was: Rudy Giuliani, our lame-duck mayor, standing with some city officials in front of a big clock on the wall, as if he was somehow going to slow down time enough for us to catch our breath. And he did.

His exhortations for us to stay calm, to dispel thoughts of retaliation against other religions or races, was so brilliant, so soul-fulfilling, so necessary – that Tessa and I turned to each other, and, having once despised the man, smiled through tears. Someone had actually said it: even on this day, the worst day in America, it is NOT OKAY to savage other people for believing differently.

If many Americans thought this Giuliani was too good to be true, they were right: apparently, these days, it’s not okay to savage other people unless they happen to be Democrats. Today he said that Democrats “do not understand the full nature and scope of the terrorist war against us” and if they were elected we’d suffer “more losses.” Giuliani is worse than just an asshole – he’s a cynical, tragic bastard, because he has proven than he knows better.

How often can the Republicans flog this horse before even the staunchest cowboys say “enough already”? It’s one thing for five-time draft-deferrer (and Known Coward) Dick Cheney to say this crap, but Giuliani? This is someone in whom we’d put an enormous amount of faith, someone who seemed genuinely changed by the lunar landscape of Ground Zero and had not just made political party affiliation meaningless, but had forged insoluble ties between Christian New Yorkers and Muslim New Yorkers. The man probably saved lives in those early days. And now he says if Democrats are elected, we’ll have more losses?

This is beyond sad, it’s despicable. It’s the Republican playbook all over again: stand on the smoking mountain of charred remains and announce that you possess the only secret that will keep it from happening again. Rudy, you kept us sane for those horrible weeks, and for that you’ll always have my gratitude. But for now, honestly, go back to your mistress and leave matters of national security to the adults who don’t need a national crisis to find their moral compass.

0 thoughts on “treason’s harbour

  1. Beth

    I found myself grudgingly liking Rudy a long time ago, when he went on MTV (with Kennedy) to say, “Our city kicks your city’s ass.” I liked him even more after 9/11. But I went right back to despising him when he started stumping for Bush. I just couldn’t see how that was necessary, any more than John McCain’s extreme social conservatism is, or any more than Rudy’s latest comments. It all just seems like so much blowing in the wind.

    Reply
  2. ken

    Giuliani. What a spineless weasel. I’ve never lived in NYC but visit a lot and pre-9/11 I simply thought of him as the guy who Disney-fied Times Square and had an affair but at least was pro-choice, kinda ballsy for a Republican. 9/11 certainly upped my impressions of him as he was a strong leader when we needed one.
    Then when he threw his hat into the ever-growing ring of Republican Presidential hopefuls and cast aside his pro-choice ideals like a bad habit, he went back to being that weasel again.
    A comedian (Bill Maher maybe?) said Giuliani should be elected “President of 9/11” and that’s all. Perfect. Well put.

    Reply
  3. Sean M

    Watching “Heroes” this week reminded me of Guiliani. In the episode, it is ‘known’ by a select few of the heroes, including the opportunistic politician guy played by the husband of a Dixie Chick, that a bomb is going to destroy the city. In the discussion that ensues about whether there’s any point in trying to stop it, the pitch is made to him that they should let it happen. A lot of people would die, but in the grand scheme of things it would be a low number and the politician could come in and wow the community with his support and compassion and, in the end, the city/world would be a better place for it. And his semi-shaky political future would be significantly more secure.
    Now I’m not saying that Rudy would have allowed 9/11 to happen had he known in advance that it would…and for the record I don’t think the guy on ‘Heroes’ will either…but I bet he’d at least have thought about it…

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *